Latest News
My latest ramblings.
Enjoy! I definitely got important things to say
My latest ramblings.
Enjoy! I definitely got important things to say
In an era of polarisation where political discourse can seem intent onâcreating division. Jacinda Ardern has been a standout leader to demonstrate the power of empathy in leadership. Ardernâs political opponents have struggled to beat her with conventional attacks. Because during her tenure as prime minister of New Zealand, from 2017 to 2023. She has created a newâarchetype of world leader. One who wields empathy and a shrink-the-boulder approach to problem-solving as well as any cutthroat politician does power moves.
Her political career is an example of what it means to recognise. That effective leadership is not just about decisions. But about the human element behind thoseâdecisions. This post investigates how empathy played a role in Jacinda Ardernâs tenure asâPrime Minister. What challenges she encountered, and the lessons we can learn from her unconventional kind of leadership.
Jacinda Ardernâs path to politics wasnât into policy interests. But a deep-seated understanding of people. Ardern was brought up in a small New Zealand town. Her formative experience instilled in her aâbelief in the power of community and the importance of empathy. Her father was aâpolice officer, and her mother was a school psychologist. Working in fields that were rooted in human emotions and interactions.
Her compassion isânot just a political tool. But a personal quality that is a product of her upbringing and education. Frequently Ardern talks about the impact that her mother had on her. So saying that herâmotherâs job as a social worker influenced the way she saw the world and how she related to people.
Prior to becoming New Zealandâs youngest woman prime minister. Ardern graduated fromâthe University of Waikato with a degree in communications and international relations. Her role as a researcher withâthe opposition party in New Zealand. Her work for the UNDP in New York city helped to cement her interest in international politics. Add a little empathy right down the middle of her relationship with international affairs.
Her formative period in the Labour Party would set theâtone for her compassionate political outlook. Virtual Forum: Rose: She wanted to craft a political agenda that doesnât justâgo along with party lines. But actually comes from real human experiences. This vision was ready when she tookâoffice in 2017.
Moment One of the defining moments of Ardernâs premiership occurredâon March 15, 2019. When a gunman, who was not a citizen of New Zealand, opened fire on two mosques in Christchurch, leaving 51 people dead. Ardernâs response to the tragedy was overwhelming empathy.
Her reply was swift and uncompromising: She hugged the grieving families, donned a head scarf to express solidarity with the Muslim community.She promised immediate actionâto change New Zealandâs gun laws. Ardernâdid not talk policy or politics in her first public comments; she talked humanity. âThey are us,â she said of theâvictims â a sentiment that struck a chord with those around the world.
Ardernâs compassion-testedâleadership wasnât just during times of crisis. She governed with an empathetic sensibility thatâinformed policy decisions. She began policies to handle schools and problems of poverty, child care andâmental health. One revolutionary measure was the âwellbeing budgetâ in 2019: Her government announced the budget. Where it described as the first ofâits kind, would no longer just measure economic growth. But would now account for the social and mental wellbeing of the people.
In addition, Ardern pushed forward progressive climate change legislation. So aiming to reduce New Zealandâs carbon emissions. And create a more sustainable future for all citizens, particularly those in vulnerable communities.
Jacinda Ardernâs time in office also ushered a change inâhow women leaders are viewed. She was a powerful mother, juggling her responsibilities both as aâhead of state and as a parent. She took six weeks of maternity leave. After the birth of her daughter Neve in 2018, a departure that defied traditionalâgender roles in politics.
In a world where women in positions of power are often under judgement with different standards than men. Ardern reminded theâworld that empathy, motherhood, and steadfastness are not mutually exclusive.
The nowâseemingly distant world of 2019 saw an intensive stream of passion â passion for policy and philosophy, and passion for public figures who aroused righteous ire or adulation. The Power of Empathy in Politics Building Trust Through Emotional Intelligence Empathy in politics doesnât just change the way leaders react in the crucible of crisis; it also has a measurable effect on public trust. Ardernâs response illustrated how emotional intelligence can be a critical asset in buildingâtrust between leaders and populations.
And the evidence indicates politicians who show empathy are more likely to buildâtrust with those they serve. This trust extended not only in and fulfilling promises but in listening, informing and understanding theâemotions, concerns and needs of the population. It was empathy thatâenabled Jacinda Ardern to create and sustain that trust, despite the most fractious times (a global pandemic and attendant economic disaster).
Ardernâs leadership extendedâbeyond New Zealandâs borders. She was a symbolâof compassionate leadership on the global stage. Her response to the Christchurch attack was praised around the world and her addressesâat the United Nations and other global forums combined diplomacy with emotional intelligence. Ardernâs capacity for discerning other cultures and viewpoints made it easy for her to relateâto world leaders and citizens across borders in ways that few politicians can.
One of the hallmarks of Ardernâs leadership style was the way she addressed crises not only as a political leaderâbut as a human being with a conscience. This became even more apparent during the COVID-19 pandemic, facing both criticism and praise for locking the country downâso early. Though not without criticism, Ardernâs devotion to public health and theâwell-being of her people enforced her high ratings. She spoke regularly and in a soothing tone, and she reassured the public and showed that she knewâthat despair had put in here.
Her empathetic mode of leading was, befittingly, widely lauded, but it was hardly without detractors. Critics on the right widely derided her policies as too idealistic, and sheâcame under scrutiny for her management of the housing crisis and child poverty. The media was, as well, and it also helped shapeâa narrative that some of her policies were weak or not pragmatic enough.
Another hurdle that Ardern confronted was the emotional burden of her empathetic leadershipâstyle. High-octane empathy is, inâfact, exhausting. Ardernâwas candid about the effect of her job on her personal wellbeing, especially following the 2019 Christchurch attacks and amid the COVID-19 pandemic. Yet despite this, she stuck with her commitment to empathic forms of leadership that, while tough, wereâcentral to her philosophy of governing.
Jacinda Ardernâs legacy is likely to be the way she transported empathy to the heart of politics. She showed that compassionate leadership generates tangible results as well as public trust atâlofty levels. In so many ways, she’s redefined leadership, and in some ways for leaders around the world, showing that leadership is not about being tough and nastyâor even rude and mean â that leadership is about compassion, knowing what the other guys are saying about your people and just saying, âHow can I help?â
Ardernâs impact will go beyond her time as Prime Minister. She has provided an example forâgenerations of leaders to come, especially women and young people who want to make a difference in the world.â Her combination of emotional intelligence and pragmatismâhas become a model for what effective leadership can be in the 21st century.
Thereâs a way to lead with heart Jacinda Ardernâs leadership offered a powerful reminder thatâpolitics neednât be practiced without empathy. By empathetically reaching out and being human, Ardern proved that empathy, and listening and understanding people, is not simplyâa moral choice, but also a pragmatic one. In todayâs fractured world, Ardernâs example provides hope for breaking with the past and developing a new politics in which empathy isnât just a personal attribute but anâorganising principle for lasting change.
Her tenure has redefined what it means to lead, and sheâs left an enduring mark onâour political landscape, reminding us that neither politics â nor politicians â have to be so small, and that the biggest, bravest, most defiantly humane hearts can emerge from the most unexpected and undefeatable places.
Shinzo Abe, Japanâs longest serving prime minister Shinzo Abe has left anâindelible impression on the international community. By recasting Japanâs role in the world through foreign policy,âAbe took a country that passively rode the wave of globalization when it practiced gunboat diplomacy into a strategic actor. From remaking Japanâs pacifist identity toâcultivating Indo-Pacific partnerships, Abeâs legacy is one of audacious goals, ideological clarity and international outreach. In this blog we examine his vision on the world, some of his key foreign policies, and analyze how he will be remembered as a leaderâto Japan and to the world.
Born in 1954, Shinzo Abe was himself born into a powerful politicalâfamily. Hisâgrandfather was a former prime minister, Nobusuke Kishi, and his father, Shintaro Abe, was foreign minister. Abe was educated in political science at Seikei University and continued his studiesâat the University of Southern California. These experiences helped populate his lens with a global view thatâwould inform how he would lead in the future.
Abe’s first term as prime minister began in 2006 and ended in 2007 as a result of hisâhealth and political difficulties. He showed his nationalist color, and the seeds of an agenda to restore Japanâs standingâin the world at a time when it had lost much of its international clout had already begun to sprout.
When Abe returned to power in 2012, he announced Abenomics, a full- scale economic reform programâbased on:
Aggressive monetary easing
Flexible fiscal policy
Structural reforms to boost productivity
The purpose of these reforms was to reviveâthe domestic economy, and to demonstrate that Japan was again competitive internationally.
Due to the policies made by Abe,âJapan showed itself as an attractive investment location. Japanese multinationals grew abroad, and inward investment and global faith in Japanâs economy were restored.
In 2015, Abe passed laws that enabledâJapan to join in collective self-defence, shattering Japanâs postwar pacifism. These have enabledâJapanâs Self-Defence Forces to assist allies in need, thus uplifting the countryâs strategic position in a difficult neighbourhood.
Abe had strong relationships with theâU.S., such as President (s) Barrack Obama, and (Donald Trump).
This idea eventually turnedâinto the nucleus of Japanâs foreign policy, and was adopted by the US, Australia and India.
Rule of law
Freedom of navigation
Open markets and free trade
Quality infrastructure development
TheâFOIP was an endeavour by Abe to create a coalition of democracies that could balance Chinaâs rising influence both in Asia and Africa.
Abe was the architect of the revival of the Quad, a strategic dialogue amongâJapan, the United States, Australia, and India. Though informal still, it helped set the stage for coordinatedâsecurity efforts and joint military exercises in the Indo-Pacific.
Abe also enhanced relationships with member statesâof the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) and facilitated investment flows to Africa from Japan in the form of the Tokyo International Conference on African Development (TICAD). His government had tried to present alternatives to Chinese-led developmentâmodels, stressing transparency, sustainability and local participation.
Following the USâ exit from the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) in 2017, Abe played a leading role inâachieving the coming into force of the Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership (CPTPP). The action confirmed Japan’s positionâas a world leader in defending free trade and multilateralism.
Although Abe has not always made this a priority, but had declared his support for climate action through implementation of the Paris Climate Agreement. His administration also championed innovation in green energy, involving technologies like hydrogen fuel and projects of lowâcarbon development.
Abeâs nationalism often led to tensionsâwith the neighbours. His pilgrimages to the Yasukuni Shrine,âwhich is dedicated to Japanâs war dead, including convicted war criminals, were interpreted by China and South Korea as needling behavior. At home he promoted textbook reforms to make historyâmore patriotic.
Abe had long aimed to amend Japanâs post-war Constitution, especially Article 9, in order to institutionalize the legitimacy of the Self-Defense Forces. Although he secured political support, public opposition and legal limitations prevented this objective from being achieved underâcross-examination.
Abeâs successors,âYoshihide Suga and Fumio Kishida, inherited and broadly continued his foreign policy agenda. And yet key components of the Abe Doctrine, including FOIP, the Quad, and higher defence budgets, are the linchpins of Japanâs internationalâstrategy.
Abe’s diplomatic skill was stronglyâadmired on the international stage, and he was praised for his long-term strategic view. July 2022 saw his assassination amid widespread worldwide mourning, which underlinedâhow pervasive his revivalist leadership had become.
Shinzo Abeâs vision extended far beyond Japanâs domestic politics. He sought to redefine the country as a proactive contributor to global stability and economic prosperity. His policies, though sometimes polarizing, elevated Japanâs global stature and created a more assertive national identity.
In an era marked by the decline of multilateralism, rising authoritarianism, and regional tensions, Abeâs advocacy for a rules-based, democratic, and open international order remains both relevant and inspiring. His strategic foresight and dedication to global diplomacy cement his legacy as one of the most consequential Japanese leaders in modern history.
Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Japan (MOFA)
Shinzo Abe: The Iconoclast Who Changed Japan â Richard Katz, Foreign Affairs
The Abe Doctrine: Japanâs Proactive Pacifism and Security Strategy â Christopher W. Hughes
Japan Times, NHK World, Nikkei Asia archives
Japan Rearmed: The Politics of Military Power â Sheila A. Smith
Lee Kuan Yew
Once a small port city struggling financially, Singapore climbed to the top of the financial world within only a few years. Lee Kuan Yew, the countryâs first Prime Minister, directed most of the changes that took place. Thanks to his practical rule, visionary decisions and strict discipline, Singapore was able to modernize.
At the time of Lee Kuan Yewâs birth in September 16, 1923 (in Singapore under British control), he became the first Prime Minister of Singapore. He belonged to a middle-class family where people had an English education. He uncovered his unique brainpower as a young man and after impressing at school, he enrolled at Raffles Institution and the London School of Economics prior to graduating from Fitzwilliam College, Cambridge.
Lee Kuan Yew graduated from Cambridge with the highest possible honors in law and was at the top of his class. Having studied law, he built the thinking skills that he would come to use in his governance.
That same year, Lee, together with a few others, established the Peopleâs Action Party which was key in leading Singapore to independence. In 1959, Lee became Prime Minister when self-governance was given to Singapore.
Lee Kuan Yew started with an initiative to remove corruption in society. Suleiman ensured that corruption laws were extremely strict, salaries for civil servants were greatly raised and all government information was transparent.
According to Lee, who advanced in government was decided by achievements and abilities. His government valued meritocracy when making decisions in government, schools and the military. Because the rule of law was established, laws were enforced fairly and in a similar way.
Since 2011, encouraging companies outside the U.S. to invest has been important for the U.S.
Lee found that for Singapore to survive, it had to take part in the global economy. Foreign businesses benefited from the governmentâs policy by receiving tax breaks, excellent infrastructure and reliable workers.
The EDB was formed in 1961 to encourage foreign investment. Because of this, many multinational companies in electronics and petrochemical industries chose to invest there.
With Lee at the helm, Singapore worked hard on its infrastructure and today, the Changi Airport, the MRT and the major ports are all favorites among the worldâs most robust systems.
Lee based his economic plan on the importance of education. He tried to make sure students prepped for industrial jobs by introducing science, technology and engineering.
As part of their education, he decided that all Singaporeans should learn to speak English and their traditional language as well. This way, preserving their heritage did not stop Singapore from joining the international economy.
His tenure, Lee Kuan Yewâs Housing and Development Board provided Singapore with affordable public housing. As a result of this initiative, over 80% of Singaporeâs citizens live in HDB flats today.
To avoid racial communities, Lee implemented rules ensuring that each housing block had a similar combination of ethnic groups and helped everyone mix better.
Years before climate change became an issue worldwide. Then Lee was instituting steps to make Singapore a âGarden City.â Here Urban planners provided parks, many trees along the streets and set tough rules to maintain a high quality of life.
Public service is required for all citizens of a country.
In the nation, Lee required every male citizen to serve in the military to safeguard their sovereignty. Consequently, people were determined and ready to fight for the protection of the country.
Because Singapore is not very large, Lee Kuan Yew still made it a notable leader in Southeast Asian diplomacy. Strongly, he supported setting up ASEAN and built close relations with many nations, from West to East.
Here, challenges and disputes in this field are stonemiles.
Even though Lee governed the country very well, he ruled it as an authoritarian. There are accusations that Stalin restricted journalists and those who promoted different ideas. At the same time, Singaporeans were willing to make these choices for the sake of stability and wealth.
Use suing, Lee tried to silence his enemies and applying legal actions against them. At the same time, those who support him suggest these laws were needed to handle the crisis in the country.
Always, Lee Kuan Yew was living simply. Though we donât have precise numbers on his net worth. But it appears that Eric Holder was never very rich. Almost all of his financial statements were public and he highlighted the role of integrity in his work as an official.
Lee Kuan Yew –Â many world leaders admire India for its achievement
Deng Xiaoping and Margaret Thatcher were among those who always remember Lee for being highly practical and effective. Continued to advise major governments and companies after he retired from being the President.
From being Prime Minister, Wong then got position as Mentor Minister.
In 1990’s, Lee Kuan Yew left the position of Prime Minister. So he began serving as Senior Minister, providing guidance to younger leaders. Today, Singapore is proof that Lee Kuan Yew managed to achieve his goals as PM.
At present, Singapore is for learning internationally. Experimental work and development, thanks to the National University of Singapore (NUS) and its collaborations with MIT and other top institutes.
This city is a major Financial Center.
Many global investors choose Singapore as one of the best places in the world for financial investments. This was brought about by the strong work Lee did in the past.
Owing to Leeâs efforts and value on cultural diversity. Remain Singaporeâs population content despite being so diverse.
No one has accomplished what Lee Kuan Yew did for the modernization of Singapore. Thanks to his vision, discipline and plans, he changed a nation from a third-world fishing village to a first-world city. While some disagree with him, his impact on building the nation was very significant. Thanks to the leadership of Lee Kuan Yew, Singapore today is efficient, clean, highly educated and admired worldwide.
Whether you are a supporter of his work or not, Lee Kuan Yew surely achieved great things. Here he led America, but he also planned and laid the foundation for a country other nations emulated. His plan to remember for teaching others about exemplary leadership, honesty and what vision can do.
 Angela Davis ideas are shaping today’s talks on feminism, racism, and classism. Her work gives a detailed look at how these factors are connected. So Davis’s contribution to understanding the experiences of women of colour.
Here Angela Davis’s story is one of courage, activism, and a never-ending fight for justice. Her birth on January 26, 1944, in Birmingham, Alabama, she faced racism, a society division. This experience shaped her future activism.
Despite facing political backlash, Davis continued teaching. Her experiences shaped her activist philosophy. The role of education in liberation
At that time ‘Women, Race, and Class’ came out was full of big changes. So civil rights movement had won big victories. But then, a conservative backlash came, trying to undo those wins.
In the early 1980s, the US saw a big rise in conservative ideas. This affected social justice movements a lot. Davis’s book was a voice of reason. During this time, pointing out what mainstream feminism was missing.
After the civil rights movement, things got complicated. Despite progress, many African Americans faced big barriers to equality.
Some of these challenges were:
Then New Right and the Reagan administration brought a big shift to the right. This time saw more pushback against social justice and a step back from progressive policies.
Her time ,Davis spoke out against the feminism. Yes, she said it ignored women of color and working-class women.
In this, Davis showed how race, class, and gender all mix together. She pushed for feminism to include more voices.
Here Davis built on the strong foundation of Black feminist thought. She used the work of earlier activists and thinkers to deepen our understanding of women’s lives.
It offers a detailed analysis that is very influential today.
Davis was a pioneer in intersectionality before Kimberlé Crenshaw even used the term. Her work showed how different oppressions combine, hitting black women the hardest.
Davis argues against focusing on just one issue. She believes we need to look at all the ways people are oppressed. This way, we can truly help those who are marginalized.
Davis uses both Marxist feminism and black feminist theory to understand women’s lives. She combines these perspectives to create a strong framework for analysis.
Davis focuses a lot on class analysis and being anti-capitalist. She shows how capitalism makes things worse for women of color. She calls for a big change in the economic system.
Davis also draws from other black women thinkers. She adds to their ideas, making black feminist thought even stronger.
Angela Davis looks closely at the suffrage movement. She finds racism and class divisions in early feminism. This is key to understanding past feminist efforts and their role today.
The early feminist movement was complex. It was tainted by racism, focusing mainly on white women’s rights. Black women’s issues were often ignored, seen as less important.
Frederick Douglass, a key abolitionist, joined the Women’s Convention. His presence showed the link between rights struggles. Yet, it also highlighted the conflict between women’s rights and abolition.
White suffragists used tactics that pushed black women out. This was done either on purpose or by neglect. It weakened the movement and kept racial divisions alive.
Class differences also plagued the suffrage movement. This caused disagreements between reform and revolution.
Working-class women faced unique struggles. They were exploited economically and worked in poor conditions. These issues were not always the focus of the suffrage movement.
The movement was split between reformers and revolutionaries. This split showed deep class divisions and different views on change.
Davis’s analysis shows how black women faced double oppression under slavery. They were slaves and women at the same time. Their enslavement was brutal, mixing racism and sexism.
Black women’s enslavement was marked by specific exploitation and violence. They faced sexual violence and were forced into reproductive labour.
Black women built and kept communities strong under slavery. It shows their fight against oppression and their strength.
After Reconstruction, propaganda showed black men as rapists. This fueled racial tensions and led to violence against them.
Lynching became a tool to control society. It was used to scare African Americans, take away their rights, and keep white people in power.
The myth of rapist hurt both black men and women. It was not just about men; women faced racism and sexism too.
The myth made black men seem violent or criminal. It turned black masculinity into a negative stereotype.
Black women fought back against lynching and the myths that supported it. They organized and fought for justice.
Aspect | Impact on Black Men | Impact on Black Women |
---|---|---|
Lynching | Subjected to violent lynching based on false accusations | Lost loved ones, faced trauma, and participated in anti-lynching campaigns |
Stereotyping | Criminalized and stereotyped as rapists | Faced both racism and sexism, with their experiences often erased |
Social Control | Terrorized and controlled through violence and fear | Experienced social and economic marginalization |
Angela Davis talks about how forced sterilization affects women, mainly black women. She says controlling women’s bodies is a way to oppress them. This is true for minority and poor women.
Eugenics and population control have shaped the history of forced sterilization. These ideas were used to justify controlling certain groups. They were seen as scientific and for the betterment of society.
Poor and minority women faced the brunt of these policies. Sterilization was often forced or done without their consent. This shows how society ignored their right to control their bodies.
Government programs made forced sterilization worse. They aimed to control population growth in specific groups. This was done under the cover of welfare reform or public health.
Davis points out that reproductive freedom is complex. The birth control movement was seen as a step forward. But, it was also linked to eugenic ideas.
The birth control movement fought for women’s right to choose. Yet, it sometimes worked with those who wanted to control certain populations. This shows we need to understand reproductive rights deeply.
Black women have fought hard for control over their bodies. They want to make their own reproductive choices.
In summary, Davis’s work on reproductive rights and forced sterilization is key. It shows how race, class, and gender intersect in reproductive health.
Angela Davis’s work looks closely at how domestic labour affects women’s economic status. She points out that capitalism plays a big role. Davis believes that not valuing unpaid household work is key to understanding women’s economic struggles.
It sees these tasks as not being economic. This undervaluing affects women’s ability to be economically independent.
Working women have to handle both their jobs and unpaid household work. This double duty makes economic inequality worse.
Domestic labour experiences differ greatly among racial and socioeconomic groups. Black women, in particular, have often been stuck in domestic service roles.
Black women have been disproportionately in domestic work, facing exploitation and marginalization. Davis stresses the importance of understanding their experiences through an intersectional lens.
Despite the obstacles, black women domestic workers have found ways to resist. They’ve organized labour unions and challenged unfair practices.
Aspect | Impact on Women | Impact on Black Women |
---|---|---|
Unpaid Household Work | Devaluation of their work | Exacerbated exploitation |
Domestic Service | Economic dependency | Racial and class hierarchies |
Resistance Strategies | Labor organizing | Community solidarity |
Education is very important in Davis’s view. It’s a key tool in the fight against oppression. Angela Davis sees education as a powerful way to resist and gain freedom. It shapes how we think as individuals and as a group.
Education is more than just learning facts. It’s about building critical consciousness and giving people the power to question things.
Davis also talks about the big gaps in education based on race and class. These issues include:
For a long time, quality education has been hard to get for those who are marginalized. This has kept oppression going.
Today, we see inequality in education. It shows up in how schools are funded, who gets to go to college, and how students are disciplined.
When the book first came out, opinions were mixed. Some people loved its fresh insights, while others found it too radical.
Media reactions were all over the place. Some saw its importance, while others thought it was too extreme.
Academics had a lot to say about Davis’s ideas.It has changed how we think and talk about these subjects.
The book’s focus on intersectionality was ahead of its time. It laid the groundwork for understanding how different forms of oppression connect. Davis’s work on black women under slavery and her critique of racism in feminism have been key to developing intersectional theory.
Angela Davis’s ideas on women, race, and class are key in today’s activism. Her work helps us see how social justice issues are connected.
Davis’s ideas are big in movements. These efforts show the fight for racial and economic fairness. Prison abolition also draws from her views on the prison system.
The reproductive justice movement benefits from Davis’s work on reproductive rights. Her insights on forced sterilization are also important.
Intersectional justice is a big deal today. So we’re fighting against economic inequality.
On todays issue, Davis’s work is vital for understanding . As Barbara Ransby says, “Angela Davis’s work shows the power of looking at things together.”
As a leader, it shows her as a leader in feminist theory. That book’s ideas about how different kinds of oppression work together are very important.
Here Davis’s work helps us see how women. Mainly those of colour, face racism and classism.About feminism, she changed the way we think. Her work has inspired many scholars and activists to come.
Now, Davis’s ideas are used in many social justice efforts. This includes Black Lives Matter and fights for reproductive rights. Her work has helped change how we see intersectionality and its role in feminism.
Then lasting impact of “Women, Race, and Class” proves Davis’s ideas are powerful. There continue to shape feminist theory and social justice movements today.
In a time of political turmoil, economic unpredictabilityâand a climate crisis that could define our future. Then modern leader must wear more hats than ever. Here they have diplomats, visionaries, crisis managers and, more and more, social influencers. One of the foreign leaders fumbling through this volatile political landscape is Justin Trudeau, the Canadian 23rd PrimeâMinister. The son of Canada’s most famous former prime minister, PierreâElliott Trudeau, Justin possessed both a potent heritage and a burdened political glare. But is he a latter-day progressive avatar. So he is a flag-bearer for the 21st-century left, orârather a talisman of liberalismâs long rout?
Letâs walk through Trudeauâs path through the maze of modern leadership. From high-minded promises and populist branding to missteps and geopolitical chess games â andâback again.
For JustinâTrudeau, a career in politics was anything but an accident. It was no small responsibility for Tucker, born December 25, 1971. Here is his family synonymous with Canadian politics.
Pierre Trudeau changedâthe face of Canadian society through his commitment to bilingualism, multiculturalism, and a strong federal government. His 15 years in office helped shape the countryâs identity, and Justinâs ascentâto power reanimated memories of his fatherâs charisma â right down to the rolled-up sleeves and rhetorical flourishes.
Trudeau was a schoolteacher prior to entering politics, serving asâa teacher at the secondary level. That less than conventional path taught him emotional intelligence, public speaking skills, both of which were theâidentity of his leadership later.
Trudeau inheritedâa shambles of a party when he became leader in 2013. His youth, his inclusivity-centered message and social media prowessâresurrected its fortunes, securing a lopsided majority victory in 2015.
Leadership by Trudeau has beenâsynonymous with progressive values. But convertingâvision into policy is always harder.
Whenâhe appointed his cabinet in 2015, Trudeau chose an equal number of men and women. He was famously askedâwhy and replied, âBecause itâs 2015. This act was a world benchmark for gender equality inâgovernance.
Trudeauâs most ambitious and divisive domestic policy has been his promise to construct a new relationship withâIndigenous peoples. The state has spent on clean water infrastructure and education, but critics sayâthe inequities continue, and promises have gone unmet.
In 2018, Canada became the secondânation to legalize recreational marijuana â a key promise of Trudeauâs campaign. Itâis widely considered a progressive triumph, but challenges around its implementation â particularly distribution and enforcement â hang over the victory.
Trudeauâsâforeign policy has had to adjust to vast global shifts: Trumpian protectionism, an increasingly assertive China and a resurgent Russia.
Trudeauâhad a roller-coaster relationship with Donald Trump that included trade tensions and personal insults. Under PresidentâBiden relations had thawed, particularly regarding climate cooperation and shared economic recovery.
The extradition case involving Huawei executive MengâWanzhou and Canadian citizens Michael Spavor and Michael Kovrig put Trudeau in an awkward diplomatic position. The standoff laid bare Canadaâs vulnerability in the global power balance andâthe bind it finds itself in as it tries to balance values with realpolitik.
In the wake of Russiaâs invasion of Ukraine, Trudeau has becomeâa vocal opponent of Vladimir Putin, loudly touting his support for Ukraineâs sovereignty, offering aid and weaponry and instituting sanctions against Russian oligarchs.
AlthoughâTrudeau has cultivated an image of idealism and moral clarity, he has not governed scandal-free.
Last year, Trudeau was accused of trying to influence his Attorney General to intervene inâthe case against a Quebec engineering company and stop a criminal trial. The scandal tarnished his public image as a high moral arbiter and set off aânational debate over whether officials were attempting to meddle with judicial procedures.
Moreâthan one picture and video of a young Trudeau was published in blackface over the course of the 2019 campaign. He apologized, but the details of what was in the emails clashed withâhis professed diversity advocacy and cast doubts on how sincere his progressivism was.
Trudeau has been twice foundâguilty of breaking ethical rules, most notoriously in the WE Charity scandal, a controversy that raised conflict-of-interest questions over a massive student grant program that struggled with a separate scandal over mismanagement.
Trudeau has some of the strongest climate change rhetoric of any G7 leader â but does this translate intoâaction?
Canada went onâto become one of the only countries to enact a national carbon tax. The policy has been lauded around the world, but it also faced legal challenges and domestic anger, especially in provinces that relyâon fossil fuels.
Trudeauâs decision to approve and purchase the Trans Mountain Pipeline expansion angered many environmentalists, who saw it as a betrayal of climate commitments. Trudeau defends the decision as a way to fund green transitions while maintaining economic stability.
Some see Trudeauâs approval and decision to purchase the Trans Mountain Pipeline expansion as a betrayalâof climate commitments that belied the threat of rampant fossil fuel use. Trudeau has defendedâthe decision as a means to help finance green transitions while stabilizing economies.
JustinâTrudeau is often referred to as a leader in and of the digital age.
Trudeauâs use of platforms like Instagram and Twitter is notâjust a form of communication â itâs also brand-building. From indigenousâgarb photo shoots to those PR-perfect family shots, his online persona is carefully groomed.
Trudeau is also no stranger to the ranks of Hollywood elites nor to international celebrity, a political personality mashed up withâinfluencer. While it increases visibility, some critics say it tends toâeclipse substance.
The focus on optics has meant that Trudeau has often been accused of governing more for show than substance â a sort of liberal populism thatâprioritises image over results.
Given the divisive nature of political discussion and the central role of election coverage in news organizations, itâis plausible that partisanship or political polarization broadly construed is a predisposing factor for news avoidance.
While reelected in 2021 Trudeau lostâthe majority. The minorityâgovernment highlights the growing polarization, with the surge of popular backing for both far-left NDP and far-right populist outfits like the Peopleâs Party of Canada.
With inflation, housing crises, and wealth disparity on the minds of Canadians,âTrudeauâs track record on the economy will be scrutinized. Fiscal expenditures in responseâto Covid-19 had stimulated recovery while also added to debt worries.
Years of broken promises and cascading scandals have diminished Trudeauâs once-ebullient politicalâcapital. For him,âthe hardest work of his career may be replenishing trust.
Asâmurmurs about Liberal leadership change become more audible, the question of whether Trudeau will go another round at the polls, and play a handing-off game with the leadership, is being asked.
Theâyears of Justin Trudeauâs leadership have been a reflection of contradictions: idealism and pragmatism, charisma and controversy, ambition and compromise. His leadership style is the essence of the modern governance dilemma â where identity, values and global power relations intersect in unprecedentedâways.
Whether history judges him as a transformational figure or as the symbol of an era of political stasis will come down to more thanâhis choices but what Canadians do with their own national story in a rapidly changing world.
India’s firstâPrime Minister, Jawaharlal Nehru, had an impressive 16 year stint. From the date of independence in 1947 until his death in 1964. While much too made ofâhis political legacy, the man behind the statesman had a very cool background to check out.
The son of a distinguished Kashmiri Brahmin, Nehru, Indiaâs future leader, enjoyed a privileged educationâat Harrow School and Cambridge University. In addition, he became the leading figure in the nationalist movement of the 1930s and 1940s. Which had a long term effectâon the quest for national independence. Hisâleadership was to mark with commitment towards parliamentary democracy, secularism and science & technology.
In this article, we will revealâthe untold stories of Nehru â from his haves to have not, from his inheritance to insurrection. We will also explore how he laid the foundation of Indiaâs democracy. He confronted political dilemmas and bequeathed aâlegacy that still shapes the country.
Long before he was Indiaâs prime minister, Jawaharlal Nehru was a boy and raised in a cookie jar of uncommon privilege. Intellectual stimulus that would form his world view and political consciousness.
The narrative of Nehruâs upbringing is anchored at Anand Bhavan. The ancestral home of the Nehrus in Allahabad, now renamed Prayagraj. Frequently mistaken for the Nehru family’s original homeâcalled Swaraj Bhavan. Anand Bhavan, built in 1927 by Motilal Nehru. Motilal Nehru co-designed the mansion himself with an architect, deployed theâTata family, indicating the family’s wealth and influence.
Life in Anand Bhavan was one of graceâand profusion. There were greatâleather-bounded collections of books. Stately monogrammed crockery and costly furniture, bought at Maple & Co of London. This was a home where Western privilege met burgeoning nationalistâfeelings. Luxurious carpets sat next to simple charkhas, coarse khadi cloth.
Jawaharlal was the first child ofâMotilal and Swarup Rani Nehru born on November 14, 1889. He was of Kashmiri lineage, his family being members of the Kashmiri Pandit community. Brahmins who had begun moving to Kashmir from what is nowâthe Indian state in the 6th and 7th centuries. Childhood Nehru described his childhood as a “sheltered and uneventful one”.He got to birth into a wealthy Kashmiri Indian family that served the Mughal Court.
His sisters were Vijaya Lakshmi Pandit and Krishna Hutheesing. The young Jawaharlal wasâraised in a large mansion in Allahabad in a wealthy and politically influential family.
Western liberalism versus Indian tradition Nehru’s education up. Until the age ofâ16 consisted of learning at home with the use of private tutors. The tutor who made the greatest impression on him was an Irishman with theosophic interests called Ferdinand T.âBrooks. Brooks was responsible for introducing young Nehru to theosophical concepts. Later led to his joining the Theosophical Society at the ageâof 13.
While his enthusiasm for theosophy abated, this early exposure led toâan interest in spiritual matters. Nehru also had an Indian teacher, a house tutor who also taught him Hindi and Sanskrit. He accidentally saw how to eat meat in Indian tradition. This incident changed him, a boy who had no contact with Hindu traditions to become aâboy familiar with Hindu tradition.
This later evolved into an in-depth study of Buddhist and Hindu philosophies. A subsequent book published years later called “TheâDiscovery of India”. At 16, Nehruâsailed away from India to Harrow, one of Englandâs grandest schools. He then went to Trinity College, Cambridge. Where he graduated withâfirst class honors in natural science in 1910. He devoured politics, economics, history, literatureâin that time.
His major intellectualâinfluences were the works of leading intellectuals. Such as Bernard Shaw, H.G. Wells, John Maynard Keynes and Bertrand Russell. It were these that most influenced his political understanding and his grasp of economics.
Nehru got to birth into a leading political familyâof India. He had the benefit of the best education available in India and England at the time of his education. As well as an anglicized upbringing, that fact should have turned him against Nationalism for life.
These sentiments were to exacerbation, the Second Boer War and the Russo-Japanese War. Of the latter, he mention(ed): In 1905 the Japanese victories had a thrilling effect. There was a moment when I thoughtâI must leave everything. Must throw myself heart and soul into the ranks of those who from their ranks were leading their country to victory. Nationalist ideas swayed my mind. I thought of Indian freedom and Asiatic freedom from the thraldom of Europe.
At Harrow, the young Nehru (who was known as âJoeâ) read the worksâof G.M. Trevelyan on Giuseppe Garibaldi, the Italian revolutionary hero. These readings led to visions of similar revolutionary feats in his land of birth. He wrote, âTheâvision of similar deeds around me in India came before of gallant fight with the British. For my gallant fight for Indian freedom, and in my brain, India and Italy got strangely mixed up.
As a result, when Nehru came back to India afterâstudying in England, he was to pull between two worlds. He became widely known as “a queer mixture ofâEast and West, out of place everywhere”. This cultural character would remain a major partâof his identity for the rest of his own.
When he returned to India in 1912 however. Jawaharlal Nehru would reluctant following the path of his father, as a barrister at the Allahabad High Court. But this promising legal career was soon to be replaced by a revolutionaryâjourney that would change both Nehru and India forever.
Unlike his father Motilal, who was oneâof the richest barristers in British India. He was earning in excess of a Rs. 10,000 a month (ÂŁ850), Jawaharlal never enjoyed the practice of law. He didn’t like the legal industry or otherâlawyers; he only had a “casual interest in it”. In fact, even Nehru confessed that he âliked neither theâlegal profession nor the lawyerâs societyâ.
At first, Nehru attempted to accept the life of luxury his privileged birth hadâprovided. Half heartedly,âfor about eight years, he practiced law. Leading to an extravagant life style his habit of going to parties and reading Punch magazine on Sundays. Yet, for hisâpart, he craved something with more purpose. He had “always, like my father, it turned out”, been “a bit ofâa gambler. First with money, then over the highest stakes of all, the big issues of life”.
His nascent political awareness slowly began to displace hisâcareer plans as a lawyer. In 1919âhe had to quit his law practice due to his nationalist politics. He would make “uncharitable comments on lawyers” ” years after he wrote this to ‘D E Gordon”. At one 9 day insisting that theyâhad “kidnapped and purloined the Constitution”.
Two pivotal events in 1919 permanently altered Nehru’s life trajectory.The Jallianwala Bagh tragedy occurred on April 13, 1919. When British troops fired upon unarmed Indians in Amritsar, killing 379 people and wounding at least 1,200. This shocking event ignited nationwide outrage and proved transformative for Nehru. He immediately involved himself in the Congress Party’s independent inquiry into the massacre.
It was a grim episode that created a furore across the country andâmade Nehru a different man. He promptly joined the CongressâPartyâs self-enquiry commission on the massacre. After the Amritsar carnage Nehru, as well as hisâfather Motilal, turned their back on constitutional reform. Then joined the Mahatma in his methods.
With his expressions of gratitude confirmed. The Nawab rode away, and as Nehru later recorded in hisâautobiography, what we outside. We who were helpless outside, waiting vainly for bits of news, and bitterness filled our souls.
He also conductedâa personal investigation of the massacre site. Then observed the way victims had tried desperately to escape over a 5 foot wall. While British forces had accordingly trained their guns on this escape point. In a chilling twist of fate, Nehru had subsequently come across Brigadier Dyer – the man who had ordered the firing – inâa train compartment. Here was appalled by his “callous manner” as he explained how he “had the whole town at his mercy”.
Meanwhile, Nehru’s association with Gandhi hadâbecome closer. They had first met in 1916 atâthe Lucknow session of Congress, but it was after 1919 that Nehru became an out-and-out devotee of Gandhi. And he was particularly struck by Gandhi’s demand for action: “that a wrong must not only be denounced butâresisted”.
The rise of a mass leader Onceâpersuaded, however, Nehruâs transformation was swift. A keyâmoment solidified his revolutionary path in 1920. While on tour in rural India, he observed widespread poverty to such an extent he felt “shame… sorrow… and compunction… at the sight of the poverty ofâIndia.”
Nehru tossed himself into the non-cooperation campaign initiated by Gandhiâin 1920. He wielded much influence as provincial Congress secretary in directing political activities inâthe United Provinces. His dedication resulted in his initial arrest on December 6th 1921 and the start of an incredible sacrifice in which he found himself in eight stretches of custody between 1921 and 1945, spending moreâthan nine years locked up for what he believed.
In 1923, Nehru became a nationalâfigure as he replaced his father, and Congress leader, as a representative for the United Provinces; Nehru was appointed general secretary of Congress, with his father serving as president of the Congress party. His political stature grew in the national level on drafting theâIndian Declaration of Independence and organizing the Independence for India League.
And yet, through this metamorphosis, Nehru was never a âblindâdevoteeâ of Gandhi. He retained his independent thinking, forâexample, at the 1927 Madras Congress session, where he outwitted Gandhi and passed a resolution demanding complete independence opposed by Gandhi. The Architect of Modern India “At the strokeâof midnight hour, when the world sleeps, India will awake to life and freedom. The success that we celebrate todayâis a mere step, an opening to further accomplishments and victories that we claim.
Are we daring enough and smart enough to seize the moment andâembrace the possibilities of the future?â Jawaharlal Nehru, First Prime Ministerâof India After a lifelong resistance to British rule, Nehru hadâbecome the principal architect of India free from oppression. He had more in mind than political independence; he had the creation of a new democratic nation based on the ideals of justice,âindividual freedom and equality.
Role in the Constituent Assembly Though Prime Minister of India for nearly a decade (1947â1964), Nehru used his personal authority to take decisions; he did not interfere in the workings of the Constituent Assembly, although he was also free to do so, being responsibleâfor it’s functioning. On December 13,â1946, he piloted the historic Objectives Resolution in the Constituent Assembly which finally led to the creation of the Constitutionâs Preamble. This resolution named asâthe Poorna Swaraj Declaration, declared India as an âIndependence Sovereign Republicâ and propagated principles of justice, liberty, and equality.
Nehru at a 1947 AICC meeting at Gowalia Tank Maidan, Bombay, he announced the famousâ”Independence of India” resolution. His words are as true today as ever, “at the stroke of the midnight hour,âwhen the world sleeps, India will awake to life and freedom”. A powerful act that in one stroke vaulted India into a realmâall its own, liberated from a subjugation, from servitude in colonial bondage to freedom.
The next day Nehru raised the Indian national flag above the Lahori Gate of the Red Fort in Delhi; this practice eventually became the standard for how the flag isâused around the country to this day. Heâdeclared in his first speech at the Red Fort, “This flag does not reflect the victory of an individual nor of the Party nor of the Government, And it is not a time to show a flag of victory for the Congress or for me or for anybody. He also stressed that it wasâ”not just the freedom and democracy of India â but for the entire world”.
Essentially, Nehru’s 16-year leadership laid strong foundations for India’s democratic institutions. Rather than pursuing authoritarian power, he promoted pluralistic multi-party democracy and respected opposition voices. In fact, he once stated that “the absence of a vigorous and vigilant Opposition was compelling evidence of the absence of democracy”.
In practice, Nehru demonstrated this democratic commitment by appointing critics to key positions. He reached out to opposition leaders like Dr. Syama Prasad Mookerjee and Dr. B.R. Ambedkar to benefit from their expertise. Furthermore, he introduced the tradition of electing opposition members as Deputy Speakers in legislative bodies.
Throughout his tenure, Nehru maintained unwavering commitments to secularism, democracy, and scientific advancement. This vision transformed India into a constitutional democracy, though his ambitious economic plans proved challenging to fully realize.
For theâseven-and-a-half-year period that he served as Prime Minister, Nehru struggled with a set of contradictions and challenges that tested his idealistic conception of India. These dilemmas displayed both theâconviction his approach had and its flaws.
Nehruâadopted a distinctive model of a âmixed economyâ that sought to meld democratic freedom with socialist planning. And he set up in 1950 what we call the Planning Commission to make Five Year Plans for the development ofâthe nation. Of course, his economic vision was one whichâmixed state control of vital industries with a lively private sector.
Jawaharlal Nehru is without aâdoubt the most enigmatic and significant man of modern times. During theâlong arc of his extraordinary life â spanning that of a favored boy turned revolutionary leader turned nation-builder â Nehru held the constant tension of high-minded aspiration and practical governance. His vision defined India during its moment of vital, formative years, building democratic institutions that remain inâplace, though under tremendous strain, to this day.
The internal contradictions ofâNehru, his own character is quite amazing. Educated in some of Britainâs finest institutions, he was an ardent foe ofâcolonialism. A scion of an aristocratic family,âhe devoted his life to working for some of the poorest in India. To be sure, his advocacy of socialist construction aside, he was always a vigorous defender ofâdemocratic rights and individual freedoms.
Not only was Nehruâs hisâlegacy not solely political. His intellectual legacies, including in books such as âThe Discovery of India,â still shape the way that Indiansâview their cultural history. His birthday is still isted as Childrenâs Day in India, by which children in entire India celebrate Nehruâs birthday acknowledging hisâfondness for children. Time has certainly exposed theâgood and bad of Nehruâs approach.
The institutions of democracy and the secular identity that he helped establishâin India held up remarkably well, even as his economic policies produced varied results. His diplomatic blunders, particularly with respect to China, exposed some of hisâblind spots. Yet his unflinching faith in democracy, pluralism and reason established an enduring template for the worldâsâbiggest democracy.
Decades after his death, Nehruâs vision and values continue toâfactor in discussions of Indiaâs identity and what will shape its future. His narrative is a timely reminder that nation-building needsâboth idealistic vision and practical wisdom -qualities that made Nehru such an unusual man in world history.
Q1. Who was Jawaharlal Nehru and what was his significance in Indian history?
He left deep imprints in the countryâs independence movement and in laying out the democratic foundations of the country, advocating secularism, socialism,âand a scientific outlook.
Q2. Explain how did the values and principles with which Nehru had been raised, had a bearingâon his political life.
Nehru was raised inâa bespoke household, schooled in India and overseas. This duality in exposure to Western liberalism and Indian traditions has constructed his worldview and made him questioning the colonial rule and finally made him oneâof the founding fathers of independence movements of India.
Q3. Whatâare the major contributions of Nehru in governing India?
The Objectives Resolution wasâpresented by Nehru in the Constituent Assembly, and was adopted by the Assembly on 22 January 1947. He also formed the Planning Committee which referred to himself as the “Author of a Dynamic Plan”, was the founder ofâthe five-year plan system, and launched the structure of a mixed economy which allowed for the government to guide private enterprise.
Q4. How is Nehru rememberedâin India now?
Nov 14 is celebrated as Childrenâs day in India (Birth Day ofâJawaharlal Nehru). He isâknown for his love for children. His books, in particular “The Discovery of India”, areâstill widely read in India and elsewhere.
Q5. What were some ofâthe problems Nehru dealt with when he was the Prime Minister?
Nehru struggled to address challenges such as the accommodationâof socialism as an effective alternative to the more radical socialism focusing on class struggle, criticism of his leadership on grounds of his faiure in war assets on the 1962 Sino-Indian War and disagreements in the party and growing discontent with the politics administration. These challenges have been testing his leadership and