Latest News
My latest ramblings.
Enjoy! I definitely got important things to say
My latest ramblings.
Enjoy! I definitely got important things to say
This Virgil Abloh documentary paints a comprehensive picture of the influential fashion designer and considers the industry’s path forward with greater diversity.
Few names carry as much weight in the fast-moving landscape of fashion as Virgil Abloh. Feted as a visionary with a tendency to erase the boundaries between art, music, and design, Abloh was more than a designer — he was a cultural architect. His influence does not just redefine how we look at streetwear but also how fashion intersects with culture, race and identity.
And just as Abloh once said, “The most important thing to me is to always put myself in other people’s shoes,” a philosophy that underpinned his work’s inclusive, boundary defying agenda. This blog takes a deep dive into the man of the hour, Virgil Abloh, and the ways in which he forever changed the fashion industry.
Abloh, born in 1980 in Rockford, Ill., to Ghanaian immigrant parents. Raised in a working-class household, Abloh’s youth was centered on his rigorous work ethic, and the rich cultural heritage of his upbringing. He grew up amid a stew of American Midwest culture and African influences; it was a practice run for his future amalgam of global aesthetics.
Abloh’s education followed the path of a mind that was most fertile when it had both structure and a bit of creative oxygen to breathe. He graduated from the University of Wisconsin-Madison and received a bachelor’s degree in civil engineering. He went on to study for a master’s degree in architecture at the Illinois Institute of Technology, and his thesis on “Post-Modern Architecture” was well received.
The specificity, rigor, and sense of space that comes with architecture greatly shaped Abloh’s method as a fashion designer. He articulated looks in architectural terms, as designs abstracted and reassembled, occasionally deconstructed, like his skeletal tweed suits.
Prior to starting Off-White, Virgil’s love of music saw him take on roles as a DJ and creative director for hip-hop musicians. His friendship and work with Kanye West was also a turning point. Kanye once famously said of Abloh, “Virgil is one of my favorite designers.”
After earning West’s attention, Abloh helped to launch the creative agency DONDA, where he learned the ropes of art direction and fashion. It played a big part in Abloh’s move from music to fashion.
Abloh started Off-White in 2012, which he marketed as “the gray area between black and white as the color off-white.” It soon played a nouveau symbol of modernity — streetwear’s brute force and luxury’s elegance entwined.
Quotation marks (well, “SHOELACES”) and zip-ties changed the way we think of branding — it’s not just a logo, it’s a declaration.
Abloh defied the traditional rules of fashion, making use of irony, appropriation, and concepts of ownership in design.
A partnership with Nike for The Ten collection turned classic sneakers into collectible art objects, changing sneaker culture forever.
To some extent, Off-White was a cultural juggernaut, popularizing the so-called “athleisure” aesthetic and redrawing the lines of streetwear.
As Louis Vuitton’s first Black artistic director, Abloh was a path-breaker who brought Black creatives to the forefront in an industry often slammed as elitist. He was also open about the responsibility he had to pave the way for others:
“I’m building on the work of true giants. It’s my responsibility to ensure the next generation has a clearer road.”
Abloh’s very existence in fashion challenged long-held racial biases, and his work continued to celebrate Black culture — reaching from the rich tapestry of the African diaspora to the company of Black artists and musicians he worked with.
Abloh’s work often embraced deconstruction, the process of taking clothing apart and reimagining it, and an approach that had as much to do with metaphor as it had to do with asking questions and building new answers around the tropes of society.
For example, his reliance on industrial labels and exposed stitching signified transparency, the breaking down of the “black box” of luxury fashion and the rendering of the design process visible and accessible.
It is one of those rare moments in fashion, when the appointment of a creative director is not only historic, but brings with it almost the weight of a nation.
In 2018, Abloh was named the Artistic Director of Louis Vuitton’s Men’s Wear, the first Black person to assume the position in the company’s 160-year history. This appointment was a significant moment, one that announced a cultural shift in power structures in fashion.
But Abloh’s creativity didn’t just stop at clothes; he was an all-around artist. He also worked with:
His interdisciplinary mindset made him an archetypal cultural architect, one who designed not only fashion but the wider creative terrain in general.
Abloh’s signature use of quotation marks was playful, but it was also profound. It made viewers and wearers wonder, what was the meaning:
Was SHOELACES just a brand, or a critique of commodification?
And the quotation marks amplified the language of fashion, turning words into design elements.
This meta-commentary invented his clothing as a conversation piece.
Leveraging his architectural background, Abloh chose:
It was an aesthetic of imperfection, of process, a space where the process of making was what mattered, not the perfection of a perfect final image.
Abloh’s work was a wholesale redefinition of what luxury fashion could be. He:
Abloh was especially committed to supporting young Black creatives, founding programs including the Post-Modern Scholarship Fund, which provides financial and mentorship aid to culturally diverse, promising designers.
He wanted to create a legacy, he said, and not just through design, but through powerful, meaningful design.
Some critics received Abloh’s rocket-ride with suspicion, playing up his work’s lack of originality. Some said his designs hijacked existing concepts without sufficient innovation.
These (& other critiques) are issues I openly addressed.
“Culture is always created based on what is beneath it. “I’m here to recontextualize and make a new meaning of it.
He also embraced the remix culture, believing it to reflect the creativity of the time.
The death in November 2021 of Virgil Abloh, from cardiac angiosarcoma, shook the creative world. Homages came from peers like Kanye West, Rihanna and Beyoncé, underscoring his enormous influence.
His death fueled discussions around representation, mental health and the pressures on creatives of color.
Meanwhile, Abloh’s own brands, design philosophy and mentorship programs continue to be sources of inspiration. His dream of a less exclusionary, interdisciplinary fashion industry lives on in his proteges and collaborators.
Virgil Abloh was so much more than a designer — he was a culture architect that tore down barriers and built bridges between art, fashion, identity, and social commentary. His legacy is a model for future creatives that want to change not just style, but the world.
As Abloh once put it:
“I want them to feel like impossible is nothing.”
His life and work are still a testament to what creative power can do to shift culture and open doors for generations to come.
When it comes to brashness, creativity, and the utter lack of fear of convention, few filmmakers have been as indelible as Quentin Tarantino. Indeed, from his explosive arrival with Reservoir Dogs to his blood-soaked love letter to Hollywood, Once Upon a Time in Hollywood, Tarantino’s output is a lesson in audacity and innovation and cinematic enthusiasm.
In this blog post, we will explore Tarantino’s brilliance through the following lenses:
The Formative Years: A Video Store Clerk’s Cinematic Education by Travis Woods My earliest job working as a clerk at a mom and pop video store was also my formative cinema education.
The product of a broken home in Los Angeles, Tarantino left high school to find stardom. Whereas most budding filmmakers aspired to film school, Tarantino received his education from the aisles of Video Archives, the video rental store where he was employed. There, he gorged on spaghetti westerns and kung fu classics and obscure B-movies.
“When people ask me if I went to film school, I say, ‘No, I went to films.’” — Quentin Tarantino
Where Tarantino stood out from the beginning was in his encyclopedic knowledge of film, and in his gift for repurposing genre tropes with a bracing new charge. His first screenplays (True Romance, Natural Born Killers) showcased a writer with a gift for biting dialogue and non-linear storytelling tendencies.
Reservoir Dogs (1992) was a game-changing earthquake in indie filmmaking. The film, shot for just over $1 million, is widely considered the best independent movie ever made.
Tarantino reinvented the heist genre by skipping the heist entirely, focusing instead on:
Who can forget:
Tarantino gave criminals the wit of philosophers and the swagger of cinephiles.
In 1994, Pulp Fiction won the Palme d’Or at Cannes and changed cinema forever. It:
Tarantino’s timeline is fractured yet masterful.
Each scene feels standalone, yet integral — creating a cinematic patchwork quilt that draws the audience in.
Think:
Tarantino proved that dialogue could be violent, poetic, and absurdly profound.
Songs like:
Adapted from Elmore Leonard’s Rum Punch, Jackie Brown (1997) is perhaps his most measured work.
Less hyper-violent, more:
Pam Grier delivers a career-defining performance in this slow-burn neo-noir.
Kill Bill Vol. 1 & 2 (2003–2004) is Tarantino’s genre mashup masterpiece — a visceral blend of:
Uma Thurman’s “The Bride” stands tall among iconic film heroines — her mythic journey is:
From:
This 2009 film reimagined WWII and weaponized cinema — literally.
The climax involves film projection as rebellion, transforming the medium into:
Christoph Waltz’s Hans Landa:
Tarantino tackled slavery through the spaghetti western lens — raw, unflinching, divisive.
Though critics debated:
…many praised its boldness and emotional honesty.
Shot in Ultra Panavision 70mm, this film was:
A nostalgic fairy tale for a bygone era of cinema.
It revealed Tarantino’s maturity — his homage to 1960s Hollywood is both dreamy and bittersweet.
Rather than exploit her story, Tarantino gives Sharon Tate a fantasy of survival.
It’s arguably his most tender cinematic gesture.
From Pulp Fiction to Kill Bill, nonlinear timelines:
Tarantino’s violence is:
His characters discuss:
Tarantino doesn’t copy — he remixes.
Every film is:
Critics argue Tarantino can be:
…but few deny his vision is distinctively his own.
He’s been accused of:
Fans argue it’s honest storytelling; detractors call it excessive.
Despite strong characters like The Bride, critics note:
He paved the way for:
Tarantino champions:
He’s promised to retire after 10 films. With 9 behind him, the world awaits his final opus:
The Movie Critic.
It’s not just that Quentin Tarantino made movies — he made events.
Every film is a:
He ignored the rules, broke taboos, and carved out his legacy in pure, unfiltered cinema.
Zaha Hadid was a force of nature in the field of architecture, a woman whose visionary sensibility and formidable personality have reshaped skylines and redrawn the boundaries of buildings. Born in Baghdad in 1950, she rose to prominence in a profession long men dominated and was for award- the Pritzker Architecture Prize in 2004, the first woman to receive it. This blog explores her extraordinary life, her pioneering contributions, and the lasting impact she made.
Zaha Hadid came from an illustrious family in Iraq. Her father, Mohammed Hadid, was a powerful politician and industrialist, and her mother, an artist. With her liberal, intellectual upbringing, Hadid got expose to multiple fields and thoughts. She spent much of her childhood traveling and attending Catholic schools in Iraq and Switzerland, forging a global perspective early in life.
Zaha Hadid arrived in London in the 1970s to study at the Architectural Association School of Architecture. It was a transformative time at the AA. Under the influence of avant-garde architects Rem Koolhaas and Elia Zenghelis, Hadid developed an audacious, experimental style. Her thesis project, “Malevich’s Tektonik”, was an homage to the Russian Constructivists and a hint of her work to come — straying into radical geometry and abstraction while incorporating movement.
In 1980, Hadid established her own London based architecture office, Zaha Hadid Architects (ZHA). The firm confronted various obstacles, not the least of which was the reluctance of the architectural world to accept a female-led practice whose designs were highly conceptual. Many of her early commissions went unbuilt, leading to her being known as a “paper architect.”
Architectural breakthrough For Hadid, that building got completion in 1993, the Vitra Fire Station in Weil am Rhein, Germany. It was small in scope, but was a step toward converting her abstract images into reality. A sculptural composition of sharp angles and dynamic planes, it heralded Hadid’s move from idea to building.
Hadid’s fluid architectural vocabulary made in projects like the MAXXI – Museum of 21st Century Arts in Rome, which was completed in 2009. The building blurs the distinctions between inside and outside, a meandering concrete shape with intersecting pathways that invites exploration and interaction. It won the Stirling Prize in 2010.
Twin pebbles on the riverbank is how the Chinese Guangzhou Opera House, which opened in 2010 and described. Its form and geometry serves to improve acoustics and enable an engaging spectator experience, weaving within the urban framework of the city. It became a symbol for China’s cultural aspirations.
It is perhaps her best known public work in the UK and known to built for the 2012 Olympic Games, the London Aquatics Centre. The roof’s cascading curves are meant to create the sensation of the movement of water, a fitting metaphor for the mission of the building. The design was loud for its architectural and operational efficiency.
The building’s undulating, wave-like design has made it a tour de force of contemporary architecture.
A futuristic urban development designed for public space, retail and exhibition.
A commercial structure of interlocking, fluid forms, and a clear demonstration of Hadid’s philosophy regarding fluidity of space.
Architecture has always been a boys club. While women in architectural education were on the rise, the same could not be said for leadership and prestigious commissions. Hadid’s ascent was itself an affront to those norms.
In 2004, her being awarded the Pritzker Prize was a watershed not just for her career but for women in architecture in general. Hadid frequently described her hardships as a woman for being from the Middle East in a male and Western-dominated field. She is the one of the woman architects who encouraged a whole lot of other women to take-up architecture with their heads up high.
Hadid’s work has been deemed deconstructivist, referring to a type of design that scorns traditional rectilinear forms. Her buildings are dynamic, fluid, and appear to be in motion. She spurned the orthodoxy of the grid and embraced a visual language that valued complexity.
In the vanguard in its use of digital technology, Hadid’s firm employed advanced computer modeling to achieve its sinuous forms. Her parametric designs gave rise to buildings with nature-inspired shapes and structural behaviors never seen before, revolutionizing the field of engineering and construction methods.
Her influences were many and varied: Russian Suprematism, Islamic calligraphy, natural topographies, mathematical patterns. Her work frequently has the look of formations in nature — rivers, dunes and coral reefs — but is determinedly future-forward.
Zaha Hadid Architects has furthered her legacy since she died in 2016. Under the guidance of Patrik Schumacher the office continues to be a leading protagonist in designing and technology. Recent projects include the Beijing Daxing International Airport and the Al Wakrah Stadium in Qatar.
Her influence spreads beyond her constructed work. She was instrumental in redefining architectural education and theory, and in teaching architects to subvert constraints and upend orthodoxy. Xenophobia Her message is still relevant in advocating for diversity in architecture.
Some critics said Hadid’s designs were more about visual excitement than utility. Complex shapes could also result in higher costs and construction difficulties sometimes prevailed. But a lot of her designs have been praised for how well they work after everything is finished.
Hadid also came under scrutiny for accepting work in areas with controversial labor practices, particularly the Gulf. In her own defense, she traced the balance of power between developers and local government, underscoring how little control architects can have over labor conditions.
Zaha Hadid had a forceful personality; she was often described as uncompromising and assertive. With high standards and relentless drive, she was both admired and criticized. But closer acquaintances also describe her as warm, funny, loyal.
Alongside architecture, Hadid also worked on furniture, jewellery and fashion. Her partnership with Chanel, Louis Vuitton and Swarovski were some of her projects fine art collaborations. They were part of her conviction in art and design as fundamentally unified, irrespective of the scale of the work or the discipline.
Zaha Hadid’s life and output are a testament to the ambition that vision needs to be met with. She made architecture into an art that soars beyond the expected, cheered complexity, movement and, above all, inclusivity. Her legacy is still evident in the world in which we live.
Hadid’s influence extends well beyond her buildings. She encouraged a generation of architects, especially women and minorities, to take on the establishment. She is a shining light for creative spirit, daring and change.
There are few names in animation that inspire as much reverence as Hayao Miyazaki. From hand-drawn magic of My Neighbor Totoro to the ersatz existentialism of Prince Mononoke to the Oscar-winning Spirited Away, Miyazaki’s mastery transcends age, region, and even that which lives within the black lines of the daydream and the dream itself. He doesn’t animate stories so much as dream them into being, providing portals into densely textured worlds that feel a lot like ours but are also a lot more enchanted.
This blog is dedicated to charting Miyazaki’s growth and career as a filmmaker, his themes, aesthetic, philosophies and his never-ending influence from Studio Ghibli.
Miyazaki was born in 1941 in wartime Tokyo and grew up in a Japan that, like much of the rest of the world, was marked by disruption, homelessness and the visceral knowledge of death. These things creep up on you in many of his films, whether it be war-torn devastation or the fragile divide between nature and manmade.
His father was employed by a company that manufactured parts for airplanes, implanting in Miyazaki a lifelong love of flight — a recurring theme in his works, from “Nausicaä of the Valley of the Wind” to “Porco Rosso.”
Miyazaki’s animation career started in the 1960s at Toei Animation, where he worked as an in-betweener but soon proved himself as a storyteller. With Isao Takahata, his creative partner and co-founder of Studio Ghibli, he would work on Future Boy Conan, Heidi, Girl of the Alps and more. But it was Nausicaä (1984), based on his own manga, that established his reputation and served as the prologue to Ghibli.
Founded in 1985, Studio Ghibli emerged from a shared dream to create auteur-driven, high-quality animation in an industry frequently characterized by formula. Under Miyazaki’s leadership, Ghibli would be synonymous with lush hand-drawn worlds, complicated female leads, and moral grayness.
Unlike many a commercial studio, Ghibli operates more as a film auteur’s atelier than a mass production pipeline. Miyazaki is famously hands-on with every part — from storyboarding to character design to music and editing. He’s a perfectionist: His method may take longer—which explains the long gestation periods between albums or songs. But he consistently produces timeless art.
One of the most recurring themes in Miyazaki’s movies is his ecological consciousness. In Princess Mononoke, the battle between human industry. Forest spirits is not just about good and evil, but about how to coexist. Nausicaä, too, foresees a world choked by pollution. But where the heroine seeks harmony, not domination.
Miyazaki, a vocal pacifist, includes anti-war themes in numerous of his works. Howl’s Moving Castle, for example, denounces the pointlessness of war with visual panache and emotional nuance. The war is not a glory — it is a lament.
The Other World and the Philosophy of the Shintô Motoworship of the Japanese and Koreans.
Movies like Spirited Away and My Neighbor Totoro offer a Shinto-informed view of the world, in which spirits live in all things, from rivers to soot. This animistic belief gives his stories a spiritual texture, in which children don’t so much navigate fantasy as learn from it.
As opposed to many of the mainstream storylines, Miyazaki’s stories are frequently about spirited and self-sufficient young women. Chihiro and (Spirited Away), Kiki and (Kiki’s Delivery Service), and San (Princess Mononoke) stand for resilience, learning, and moral action. They’re not waiting to be rescued — they’re the rescuers.
He has been an insurgent promoting hand-drawn animation in an age of CGI. His films are a visual delight — every frame a painting, each background packed with detail. Whether it’s a castle in the sky that sails across a meadow or a bathhouse teeming with spirits, his images have an organic warmth that digital animation frequently fails to capture.
Among his most praised features is his use of “ma” (空) – the distance between people and or objects, and he was increasingly recognized throughout his career for this particular emphasis. These moments, when a character is breathing, just looking, just being, provide his films with a lyrical rhythm and emotional depth that is conspicuously absent from the frantic pace of most Western animation.
In Totoro, for example, long stretches of quiet aren’t narrative doldrums — they’re times for tourists to plunge into a character’s sensations. The wind in the trees, the rustling grass, the chime of distant bells — it all helps the audience feel the world, not simply watch it.
Spirited Away was the first (and, so far, only) non-English animated film to win the Academy Award for best animated feature, a groundbreaking development for animation around the world. It went on to become Japan’s top-grossing film fro almost 20 years.
And beyond the box office and the awards, Miyazaki’s influence seeps into global pop culture — from fashion to video games to architecture. The director who would pay Arnoult most handsomely for his influence is probably Guillermo del Toro, but he also figures as a key touchstone for Wes Anderson and even for Pixar’s Pete Docter.
The Ghibli Museum, in Mitaka, Tokyo, isn’t just a tourist destination — it’s a place of pilgrimage for fans. Ghibli Park, which recently opened among life-size recreations of Totoro’s forest and the Catbus, has attracted visitors from around the world.
Miyazaki has “retired” on several occasions, and each announcement was greeted with mourning and skepticism. But like the characters in his stories, he keeps going back. His new film, The Boy and the Heron (2023), was billed as his “last,” but he’s already working on new storyboards.
Because for Miyazaki, animation is not just an occupation but a mania. He draws because he must. Because the worlds he harbors inside him have become too insistent, too noisy, to ignore. As long as his hands can draw, the doors to Ghibli’s dreamlands are left forever ajar.
And children understand more than we think, although that is not the insight for which Miyazaki is typically credited. His films don’t condescend to younger viewers — they respect their intelligence, feelings and sense of right and wrong. It’s that mind-set which makes his work connect with generations.”
For all his engagement with war, death and environmental ruin, Miyazaki isn’t a depressive filmmaker. His movies contain a quiet, steady hope — not for some grandiose deliverance, but for small, humane decisions. In giving a soot sprite something to eat, in planting a seed, in standing up for a friend.
Hayao Miyazaki is more than an animator — he’s a cartographer of the soul. So he drawn our dreams, fears and yearnings onto the screen in stories that span lifetimes beyond our own. His work serves as a reminder that magic is not a show but a mode of seeing. That sense of wonder is not just the province of children. But of any who dare to keep their eyes wide open to the world of the possible.
In an age of noise, Miyazaki’s films are a faint whisper. And we pay attention — not just with our ears, but with our hearts.
“A lot of the movies I make have powerful women, not just women who are strong. But powerful, and they don’t think twice about fighting for what they believe in. They are going to need a friend, or an ally, but never a savior.”
— Hayao Miyazaki
In an era of polarisation where political discourse can seem intent on creating division. Jacinda Ardern has been a standout leader to demonstrate the power of empathy in leadership. Ardern’s political opponents have struggled to beat her with conventional attacks. Because during her tenure as prime minister of New Zealand, from 2017 to 2023. She has created a new archetype of world leader. One who wields empathy and a shrink-the-boulder approach to problem-solving as well as any cutthroat politician does power moves.
Her political career is an example of what it means to recognise. That effective leadership is not just about decisions. But about the human element behind those decisions. This post investigates how empathy played a role in Jacinda Ardern’s tenure as Prime Minister. What challenges she encountered, and the lessons we can learn from her unconventional kind of leadership.
Jacinda Ardern’s path to politics wasn’t into policy interests. But a deep-seated understanding of people. Ardern was brought up in a small New Zealand town. Her formative experience instilled in her a belief in the power of community and the importance of empathy. Her father was a police officer, and her mother was a school psychologist. Working in fields that were rooted in human emotions and interactions.
Her compassion is not just a political tool. But a personal quality that is a product of her upbringing and education. Frequently Ardern talks about the impact that her mother had on her. So saying that her mother’s job as a social worker influenced the way she saw the world and how she related to people.
Prior to becoming New Zealand’s youngest woman prime minister. Ardern graduated from the University of Waikato with a degree in communications and international relations. Her role as a researcher with the opposition party in New Zealand. Her work for the UNDP in New York city helped to cement her interest in international politics. Add a little empathy right down the middle of her relationship with international affairs.
Her formative period in the Labour Party would set the tone for her compassionate political outlook. Virtual Forum: Rose: She wanted to craft a political agenda that doesn’t just go along with party lines. But actually comes from real human experiences. This vision was ready when she took office in 2017.
Moment One of the defining moments of Ardern’s premiership occurred on March 15, 2019. When a gunman, who was not a citizen of New Zealand, opened fire on two mosques in Christchurch, leaving 51 people dead. Ardern’s response to the tragedy was overwhelming empathy.
Her reply was swift and uncompromising: She hugged the grieving families, donned a head scarf to express solidarity with the Muslim community.She promised immediate action to change New Zealand’s gun laws. Ardern did not talk policy or politics in her first public comments; she talked humanity. “They are us,” she said of the victims — a sentiment that struck a chord with those around the world.
Ardern’s compassion-tested leadership wasn’t just during times of crisis. She governed with an empathetic sensibility that informed policy decisions. She began policies to handle schools and problems of poverty, child care and mental health. One revolutionary measure was the “wellbeing budget” in 2019: Her government announced the budget. Where it described as the first of its kind, would no longer just measure economic growth. But would now account for the social and mental wellbeing of the people.
In addition, Ardern pushed forward progressive climate change legislation. So aiming to reduce New Zealand’s carbon emissions. And create a more sustainable future for all citizens, particularly those in vulnerable communities.
Jacinda Ardern’s time in office also ushered a change in how women leaders are viewed. She was a powerful mother, juggling her responsibilities both as a head of state and as a parent. She took six weeks of maternity leave. After the birth of her daughter Neve in 2018, a departure that defied traditional gender roles in politics.
In a world where women in positions of power are often under judgement with different standards than men. Ardern reminded the world that empathy, motherhood, and steadfastness are not mutually exclusive.
The now seemingly distant world of 2019 saw an intensive stream of passion — passion for policy and philosophy, and passion for public figures who aroused righteous ire or adulation. The Power of Empathy in Politics Building Trust Through Emotional Intelligence Empathy in politics doesn’t just change the way leaders react in the crucible of crisis; it also has a measurable effect on public trust. Ardern’s response illustrated how emotional intelligence can be a critical asset in building trust between leaders and populations.
And the evidence indicates politicians who show empathy are more likely to build trust with those they serve. This trust extended not only in and fulfilling promises but in listening, informing and understanding the emotions, concerns and needs of the population. It was empathy that enabled Jacinda Ardern to create and sustain that trust, despite the most fractious times (a global pandemic and attendant economic disaster).
Ardern’s leadership extended beyond New Zealand’s borders. She was a symbol of compassionate leadership on the global stage. Her response to the Christchurch attack was praised around the world and her addresses at the United Nations and other global forums combined diplomacy with emotional intelligence. Ardern’s capacity for discerning other cultures and viewpoints made it easy for her to relate to world leaders and citizens across borders in ways that few politicians can.
One of the hallmarks of Ardern’s leadership style was the way she addressed crises not only as a political leader but as a human being with a conscience. This became even more apparent during the COVID-19 pandemic, facing both criticism and praise for locking the country down so early. Though not without criticism, Ardern’s devotion to public health and the well-being of her people enforced her high ratings. She spoke regularly and in a soothing tone, and she reassured the public and showed that she knew that despair had put in here.
Her empathetic mode of leading was, befittingly, widely lauded, but it was hardly without detractors. Critics on the right widely derided her policies as too idealistic, and she came under scrutiny for her management of the housing crisis and child poverty. The media was, as well, and it also helped shape a narrative that some of her policies were weak or not pragmatic enough.
Another hurdle that Ardern confronted was the emotional burden of her empathetic leadership style. High-octane empathy is, in fact, exhausting. Ardern was candid about the effect of her job on her personal wellbeing, especially following the 2019 Christchurch attacks and amid the COVID-19 pandemic. Yet despite this, she stuck with her commitment to empathic forms of leadership that, while tough, were central to her philosophy of governing.
Jacinda Ardern’s legacy is likely to be the way she transported empathy to the heart of politics. She showed that compassionate leadership generates tangible results as well as public trust at lofty levels. In so many ways, she’s redefined leadership, and in some ways for leaders around the world, showing that leadership is not about being tough and nasty or even rude and mean — that leadership is about compassion, knowing what the other guys are saying about your people and just saying, “How can I help?”
Ardern’s impact will go beyond her time as Prime Minister. She has provided an example for generations of leaders to come, especially women and young people who want to make a difference in the world.” Her combination of emotional intelligence and pragmatism has become a model for what effective leadership can be in the 21st century.
There’s a way to lead with heart Jacinda Ardern’s leadership offered a powerful reminder that politics needn’t be practiced without empathy. By empathetically reaching out and being human, Ardern proved that empathy, and listening and understanding people, is not simply a moral choice, but also a pragmatic one. In today’s fractured world, Ardern’s example provides hope for breaking with the past and developing a new politics in which empathy isn’t just a personal attribute but an organising principle for lasting change.
Her tenure has redefined what it means to lead, and she’s left an enduring mark on our political landscape, reminding us that neither politics — nor politicians — have to be so small, and that the biggest, bravest, most defiantly humane hearts can emerge from the most unexpected and undefeatable places.
Shinzo Abe, Japan’s longest serving prime minister Shinzo Abe has left an indelible impression on the international community. By recasting Japan’s role in the world through foreign policy, Abe took a country that passively rode the wave of globalization when it practiced gunboat diplomacy into a strategic actor. From remaking Japan’s pacifist identity to cultivating Indo-Pacific partnerships, Abe’s legacy is one of audacious goals, ideological clarity and international outreach. In this blog we examine his vision on the world, some of his key foreign policies, and analyze how he will be remembered as a leader to Japan and to the world.
Born in 1954, Shinzo Abe was himself born into a powerful political family. His grandfather was a former prime minister, Nobusuke Kishi, and his father, Shintaro Abe, was foreign minister. Abe was educated in political science at Seikei University and continued his studies at the University of Southern California. These experiences helped populate his lens with a global view that would inform how he would lead in the future.
Abe’s first term as prime minister began in 2006 and ended in 2007 as a result of his health and political difficulties. He showed his nationalist color, and the seeds of an agenda to restore Japan’s standing in the world at a time when it had lost much of its international clout had already begun to sprout.
When Abe returned to power in 2012, he announced Abenomics, a full- scale economic reform program based on:
Aggressive monetary easing
Flexible fiscal policy
Structural reforms to boost productivity
The purpose of these reforms was to revive the domestic economy, and to demonstrate that Japan was again competitive internationally.
Due to the policies made by Abe, Japan showed itself as an attractive investment location. Japanese multinationals grew abroad, and inward investment and global faith in Japan’s economy were restored.
In 2015, Abe passed laws that enabled Japan to join in collective self-defence, shattering Japan’s postwar pacifism. These have enabled Japan’s Self-Defence Forces to assist allies in need, thus uplifting the country’s strategic position in a difficult neighbourhood.
Abe had strong relationships with the U.S., such as President (s) Barrack Obama, and (Donald Trump).
This idea eventually turned into the nucleus of Japan’s foreign policy, and was adopted by the US, Australia and India.
Rule of law
Freedom of navigation
Open markets and free trade
Quality infrastructure development
The FOIP was an endeavour by Abe to create a coalition of democracies that could balance China’s rising influence both in Asia and Africa.
Abe was the architect of the revival of the Quad, a strategic dialogue among Japan, the United States, Australia, and India. Though informal still, it helped set the stage for coordinated security efforts and joint military exercises in the Indo-Pacific.
Abe also enhanced relationships with member states of the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) and facilitated investment flows to Africa from Japan in the form of the Tokyo International Conference on African Development (TICAD). His government had tried to present alternatives to Chinese-led development models, stressing transparency, sustainability and local participation.
Following the US’ exit from the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) in 2017, Abe played a leading role in achieving the coming into force of the Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership (CPTPP). The action confirmed Japan’s position as a world leader in defending free trade and multilateralism.
Although Abe has not always made this a priority, but had declared his support for climate action through implementation of the Paris Climate Agreement. His administration also championed innovation in green energy, involving technologies like hydrogen fuel and projects of low carbon development.
Abe’s nationalism often led to tensions with the neighbours. His pilgrimages to the Yasukuni Shrine, which is dedicated to Japan’s war dead, including convicted war criminals, were interpreted by China and South Korea as needling behavior. At home he promoted textbook reforms to make history more patriotic.
Abe had long aimed to amend Japan’s post-war Constitution, especially Article 9, in order to institutionalize the legitimacy of the Self-Defense Forces. Although he secured political support, public opposition and legal limitations prevented this objective from being achieved under cross-examination.
Abe’s successors, Yoshihide Suga and Fumio Kishida, inherited and broadly continued his foreign policy agenda. And yet key components of the Abe Doctrine, including FOIP, the Quad, and higher defence budgets, are the linchpins of Japan’s international strategy.
Abe’s diplomatic skill was strongly admired on the international stage, and he was praised for his long-term strategic view. July 2022 saw his assassination amid widespread worldwide mourning, which underlined how pervasive his revivalist leadership had become.
Shinzo Abe’s vision extended far beyond Japan’s domestic politics. He sought to redefine the country as a proactive contributor to global stability and economic prosperity. His policies, though sometimes polarizing, elevated Japan’s global stature and created a more assertive national identity.
In an era marked by the decline of multilateralism, rising authoritarianism, and regional tensions, Abe’s advocacy for a rules-based, democratic, and open international order remains both relevant and inspiring. His strategic foresight and dedication to global diplomacy cement his legacy as one of the most consequential Japanese leaders in modern history.
Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Japan (MOFA)
Shinzo Abe: The Iconoclast Who Changed Japan – Richard Katz, Foreign Affairs
The Abe Doctrine: Japan’s Proactive Pacifism and Security Strategy – Christopher W. Hughes
Japan Times, NHK World, Nikkei Asia archives
Japan Rearmed: The Politics of Military Power – Sheila A. Smith